Starts the comparison of wages. It has been fixed for tomorrow, in fact, the meeting between the Government and social partners to reach agreement sull'irrobustimento wages. According to the words of Sircana, however, will not be taken immediate action, but rather will turn a round table discussion to develop in order to induce the unions to not formalizing a general strike on January 15. The Executive Board will propose to its partners to prevent the facts of the same mobilization. Confindustria agree on raising wages, but to a specific condition: the increase should be the culmination of an actual increase in productivity. And it can not be wrong to give. But how to implement the conjunction "productivity-wage increase? Focusing particularly on deductions and exemptions on the increase. Knows Tiziano Treu, who in an interview future issued on Sunday said: "The deduction, for the same income, rewards everyone equally. The relief on gains, however, has two advantages: it gives more money to workers and rewards those who are more productive. Dando, with this, an economic benefit to the entire country, as also recognized by Bank of Italy. " The same Prodi had announced several times: initially, a higher tax levy to subsidize the public finances, and then redistributing the monies collected to workers and families. However, this government has allowed a folk interlude: the revision of the staircase. In the state budget, in fact, the "costs" have been transcribed Of € 7.48 billion (during the years 2008 to 2017) to allow 150,000 workers to retire early in a quiescent state, there is no money for social safety nets (precondition not to distort the positive effects of flexibility) and without doubt there will be no money to sanitize a tax burden somewhat bitter. What have unions? Instead of asking the Government, under the signature of the Protocol on welfare, to devote those resources to fund relief operations in the tax burden on income from employment, preferred for people who want to retire at age 58. After all a reflection of endogenous union strategies highlights the propensity of the same to protect the interests of their members (mainly pensioners). Geminello Alvi writes the columns of The Journal of 6 January: "What does it matter who's fault now earn at least € 40 thousand per year with the fact that trade unions in a boom in profits have betrayed the job? Leaving among other things, the rise between '96 and 2001, the tax burden of direct taxes on income from employment from 15% to 17.4%. In addition, in our country that happens, unfortunately, not infrequently, the workers do the accounts on how many hours of overtime they have done, so that the criterion of progressiveness of the tax system does not obstruct the work energy expenditure, absorbing the additional revenue in taxes. Thus, not only deprives workers of the ability to "accommodate" later this month's income, but from a macroeconomic perspective the whole economy languishes, as it is slowed productivity. The tax relief measures are therefore desirable for the benefit of workers, especially those with low incomes and therefore purchasing power is limited, but less revenue in state coffers can not be compensated with Monopoly money. Without doubt, this analysis should not be confused with the romance of the Minister of Economy, which argues that the taxes are "a beautiful thing," because it goes without saying that any economic action have to have resources with which to finance. Lacking a financial parachute, no government would put their hands in the portfolio. The protection of purchasing power is both a right and a duty and should not be dictated by a state of emergency inflation. " But the Protocol of 23 July 1993 did not require that the parties will meet twice a year to make structural consultation on wages?
Alessio Maniscalco
0 comments:
Post a Comment